F404 Propulsion Grp Interim Sys
Solicitation number W8485-14DL01/B
Publication date
Closing date and time 2014/03/19 15:00 EDT
Last amendment date
Description
Trade Agreement: NONE Tendering Procedures: All interested suppliers may submit a bid Attachment: None Competitive Procurement Strategy: Lowest/Lower Bid Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement: No Nature of Requirements: Trade Agreement: NONE Tendering Procedures: All interested suppliers may submit a bid Attachment: None Competitive Procurement Strategy: Lowest/Lower Bid Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement: No Nature of Requirements: F404 Propulsion Group Interim System Support Description for NPP for W8485-14-DL01 GSIN: JX2840A DESCRIPTION: F404 Propulsion Group Interim System Support Question Set: Question #1: Can you advise of the bid receiving unit hours of operation? Response #1: Bid Receiving Unit is open from 7:30am to 4:00pm Monday through Friday. Holidays and afterhours bids can be dropped in the drop box located outside of the Bid Receiving Unit. Question #2: The MC-14 indicates a requirement for onsite or offsite storage of at least 28,000 cubic feet. The response to Question 2 posted on March 3rd indicated the types of inventory that require storage (thanks). The estimated dollar value of the material is very significant at well over $200M; Question #2.a: Is this breakout of material $ (estimate) all expected to be stored at the contractor facility? Response #2.a: The Contractor is expected to co-locate with MRO operations the following items: - CIS; - AAS; - GFOS; - items awaiting induction; and - items awaiting engineering disposition. Question #2.b The space requirement of 28,000 cubic feet does not seem to be consistent with the $ of material listed (estimates). The $ value of inventory quoted would seem to require significantly more space than the RFP requirement. Please clarify. Response #2.b: The space requirements to dollar value are not considered relevant. As indicated in MC #14, 28,000 cu ft is a workable minimum spare requirement for the materiel. Question #2.c Can you advise how the 28,000 cubic feet of storage required would translated into actual floor space (ie. square feet)? Response #2.c: No further clarification is available. Ultimately the contractor will determinethe appropriatematerial storage requirements that willsatisfy the contractwhile providing best value toCanada. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- -------- Please note that for this requirement the closing date has been amended to March 19, 2014 at 14:00 Eastern Standard Time (EST). Question set: Question 1a: Would Canada clarify why this procurement seems to contradict government policy on Key Industrial Capabilities for defence procurement? Response to item #1a: This procurement was initiated prior to the announcement of the current Defence Procurement Strategy. As such, the existing industrial regional benefits and national security exemptions were applied. However, for the long-term F404 Propulsion Group System Support solution, all applicable elements identified within the Defence Procurement Strategy will be applied. b. The timeframe required to identify IRB transactions for IRB mandatory requirements seem misaligned with the 1+1 year contract duration. Question 1b: Would Canada consider adjusting the required timing for submission of eligible IRB transactions to the following: i. 70% of IRB transactions identified at time of proposal; ii. 100% of IRB transactions identified 1 year ACA. 2. Technical Evaluation Mandatory Requirements Questions: The points expressed in Questions b & 1b are reflected in the amendment to the IRB portion of the RFP. Question #2 Please clarify the contents of Volume V. Section 1. Bid Preparation Instructions. This section identifies Section V as Industrial Regional Benefits, however, further in Section 1, Bid Preparation Instructions, the same section (Section V) is titled Additional Information and requests 1.1 Bidder's Proposed Site or Premises Requiring Safeguarding. Is this additional information regarding safeguarding to be included in Section V: IRB Bid? Response to Question #2 PART 3 - BID PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS, paragraph 1. Bid Preparation Instructions, article V should be renamed as "Additional Information" and not Industrial and Regional Benefits Bid (2 hard copies) The Industrial and Regional Benefits (IRB) bid is to be submitted as per the IRB bid instructions contained in the IRB Model Bidder Instructions. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- The revised documents have been included in the attached RFPEv2.zip ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Questions and Answers Question 1: Reference Part 7Annex B, Para 3.5.1 and 3.5.2: The dates referenced in this paragraph are before the bid due date. These dates should be amended. Response to item #1: DND has reviewed the request to update the CTIP schedule. Revisions toPart 7, Annex B, Technical SOW paragraphs 3.5.1,3.5.2,3.5.4 and 3.6.1have been amended from a. Contract Award / Contract Start Date:3 Mar 14 (estimated); b. Kick-Off Meeting:4 Mar 14; c. Commencement Readiness Review Meeting #1:18 Mar 14; d. IOC/ Commencement Readiness Review Meeting #2: 1 Apr 14; e. Commencement Readiness Review Meeting #3: 15 Apr 14; and f. FOC / Commencement Readiness Review Meeting #4: 1 May 14 to: a. Contract Award / Contract Start Date:25 Mar14 (estimated); b. Kick-Off Meeting: 27 Mar 14; c. Commencement Readiness Review Meeting #1: 28 Mar 14; d. IOC / Commencement Readiness Review Meeting #2: 1 Apr 14; e. Commencement Readiness Review Meeting #3: 15 Apr 14; and f. FOC / Commencement Readiness Review Meeting #4: 1 May 14 It is to be noted that the IOC date of 1 Apr 2014 and FOC date of 1 May remain unchanged. Question 2: Reference Part 4, Annex B MC14: Could you clarify the intended use of the inventory storage requirements (Ref MC 14) "Inventory holding report 25 Feb 2014". Response to item #2: DND has reviewed the request for clarification of the inventory storage requirements (Ref MC #14). The inventory storage requirements consist of a mix of consumables, repairables, AAS, GFOS, CIS etc. (a) The following estimates AAS, GFOS, and CIS are within the table below: $180M unrestricted stock in containers and triwalls. $ 7M blocked stock Note: -Blocked items estimate based on scrap only formerly DS items from old system. Some of value may include items in quarantine area or previously scrapped. Delay in processing items into DRMIS may make the amount appear larger. About 3000 OIRs with scrap action are pending. $ 13M quarantined stock $ 14M AA spares $ 22M GFOS consumable $ 3.7M GFOS repairable (b) The attachedspreadsheet entitled "Inventory holding report 25 Feb 2014"contains the estimated quantityof AAS, GFOS and CIS held in inventory. Question 3: Reference Part 4, Para 1.2.1, (Management Evaluation Criteria): Could you clarify what evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate Section II of the proposal. Response to item #3: Part 4, paragraph 1.2.1 (Management Evaluation Criteria) shall be removed. Question 4: Reference Part 3, Section II Management Bid: The bid preparation instructions indicate that Bidders are to provide their client contacts. Could you clarify? Please also advise what level of detail is required, and for what work. Response to item #4: Part 3, Section II Management Bid shall be removed. Question 5: Reference Part 4, Annex B MC 8: Could you clarify how the amount of R&O work to be done in Canada was calculated and why it is different from the recent T56 solicitation that only required 50% NSE. Such a high threshold drives a level of inefficiency and cost that may not in the best interests of the Government of Canada. Response to item 5: The National Security Exception was requested to be invoked by The Department of National Defence to ensure a source of supply in Canada for particular goods or services necessary for DND and CF operational readiness. The Department of National Defence has identified that in this specific case, it requires 90% of the maintenance, repair and overhaul labour to be conducted in Canada for national security reasons. Ref Reference Part 4, Annex B MC 12; Question 6: MC12 is not clear on the level of detail required. Is it is your intent that we provide the entire contract or alternately, could we submit the relevant sections of the contract that show its scope, scale and complexity. By limiting the documentation to the relevant sections of the contract (or contract SOW), one could significantly reduce the efforts and page count required to provide compliance with MC. 1. Has the Bidder (or its subcontractor) provided relevant portions of their publications contract that demonstrate that they provide services similar in scale, scope and complexity to Annex F, Publications Management Services SOW? Response to item #6: To clarify,the bidder shall provide the complete contract with a clear indication of the relevant sections which demonstrate their compliance toMC #12. It is acceptable to submit the response to MC #12 in an electronic format. Question 7: Reference Part 4, Annex B MC 3:Airworthiness: Could you clarify if we need to submit our approved Design Approval Organization Procedures and Maintenance Process Manuals if these documents have been already approved by DND through DTA. Alternatively, could we submit our DTA approval letter or provide a printout of the DND web page that lists the TAA approved organizations (which also includes scope of their approvals). See the following link: http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/business-regulations-technical-airwort hiness/accreditation-recognition.page Response to item #7: Yes, the Bidder shallsubmit the complete airworthiness process manual as specified in MC #3. The Technical Evaluation team shall only evaluate thosedocuments provided as part of the bid submission.It is acceptable to submit the response to MC#3 in an electronic format. Question 8: Could you extend the proposal due date to March 10th? Response to item 8: Proposal due date will be extended to March 17th. Significant Issues Question 9: Ref Reference Part 4, Annex B MC 5 (Sub Contracts): Could you provide clarity on the level of detail required of the "subcontractor agreements"? Would a MOU (memorandum of understanding) or Letter of Offer (including commitment to support and the agreed to roles and responsibilities)? Industry doesn't typically establish executable subcontracts until they have been awarded a particular competition. Only the incumbent would likely have executed subcontracts with their team as they are already performing the work. Response to item #9:An agreement between the Bidder and their sub-contractor to undertake the work specified in the RFP by the sub-contractor will be required by contract award. These agreements must demonstrate the ability to have sub-contract(s) in place by contract award date. Question 10: Reference Part 4, Annex B, MCs 1, 3, 10, 11, 12: Is it Canada's intent that only the Bidder meet these requirements (and not their subcontractors)? If so, this precludes the use of critical subcontractors, who already possess the required capabilities and in some cases are already doing this work today. We don't believe that it is in Canada's best interests in terms of a fair and open competition to restrict these requirements to only the Bidder (or Prime). Additionally, we note that there is an inconsistency between MC3 and 10. If a subcontractor is accredited as ADO then that same subcontractor should also satisfy the requirements of MC10 . The absence of the subcontractors in MC10 places a stringent requirement on this RFP that is inconsistent with MC3. Accordingly, we suggest that subcontractors be added to MC10 and also the other listed MCs above, and that Annex B is amended to include "Bidder or their subcontractors". Response to item #10: For MC # 1, 3, 10, 11 and 12, the Crown agrees to the request to include both the Bidder himself and/or the entity performing the Work when evaluating these criteria Question 11: Reference Part 6, as well as Part 7 Annex G (SRCL): Could you clarify the security requirements by work stream? Please note that with the potential for work streams to be performed in different Facilities/locations. Also, could you confirm that the security classification of the production category? • The Security Requirements Checklist (SRCL) at Annex G to the RFP (Part C - Safeguards (Supplier)) indicates that the production of classified material or equipment will occur at the supplier's site (see checkmark in Yes box). This requirement is further amplified on the Summary Chart in Part C where a" Secret" security level is specified the production category. • To the best of (the Bidder's) knowledge, there isn't a security level associated with the MRO of the F404 engine. Is the security classification of the production category correct? • In a related matter, according to paragraph 19.2 of Part 7 - Resulting Contract Clauses, a supplier must possess a "Confidential" security level for its Production capabilities. Alternatively, the SRCL indicates that the production category must have a security level of "Secret". Is the security classification of the production category in paragraph 19.2. Response to item #11:With reference to the SRCL Supplemental Security Guide, Part B, clarificationfor thesecurity requirement by work streams isas follows: The following work streams require SECRET clearance: - Engineering - IM/IT - Program Manager - Offsite Services- LCMM - Offsite Services -CSR - Offsite Services -TSR The remainder, including MRO, require enhancedreliability clearance. Production, as referred to in paragraph 11 of the SRCL was considered to include production in terms of engine MRO but also software programs. Question and Answer Set #2 Question 1a: Would Canada clarify why this procurement seems to contradict government policy on Key Industrial Capabilities for defence procurement? Response to item #1a: This procurement was initiated prior to the announcement of the current Defence Procurement Strategy. As such, the existing industrial regional benefits and national security exemptions were applied. However, for the long-term F404 Propulsion Group System Support solution, all applicable elements identified within the Defence Procurement Strategy will be applied. b. The timeframe required to identify IRB transactions for IRB mandatory requirements seem misaligned with the 1+1 year contract duration. Question 1b: Would Canada consider adjusting the required timing for submission of eligible IRB transactions to the following: i. 70% of IRB transactions identified at time of proposal; ii. 100% of IRB transactions identified 1 year ACA. 2. Technical Evaluation Mandatory Requirements Questions: Response to come 2a. Question: MC-1: Could Canada clarify the duration, scope and depth of the valid F404-GE-400 or F404-GE-402 that would be considered compliant with this requirement. For example, do valid F404-GE-400 or F404-GE-402 contracts need to be of similar scale, scope, and complexity as the RFP SOW? Response to item #2a (x-ref Mandatory Criteria #1):Mandatory Criteria number 1 has been clarified to state: "The Bidder shall provide the contract numbers and client names of valid MRO contracts for the F404-GE-400 or F404-GE-402 engines that they (or their subcontractor) are currently performing." 2b. Question: MC-3: For Method of Compliance, could Canada clarify whether the documentation provided by the Bidder under the Method of Compliance needs to be related to either: i. F404-GE-400 or F404-GE-402 and related systems; or ii. An engine(s) and system(s) of similar scope, depth and complexity (ie. Fighter aircraft afterburning turbofan engine(s) and related system(s)). Response to item #2b (x-ref Mandatory Criteria # 3): Yes, the documentation can be related to either: i. F404-GE-400 or F404-GE-402 and related systems; or ii. An engine(s) and system(s) of similar scope, depth and complexity (ie. Fighter aircraft afterburning turbofan engine(s) and related system(s)). Similar scope, depth and complexity is defined as a fighter aircraft afterburning turbofan engine and related systems. 2c. Question: MC-7: Would Canada clarify whether the Bidder must demonstrate, through a resource and capacity analysis, that it has the ability to induct and complete, by the corresponding monthly amount and completed in the corresponding amount of calendar days? Or is a simple certification sufficient? Response to item #2c (x-ref Mandatory Criteria # 7): DND has reviewed the request and advises that no change is required. The CTIP provided under MC #4 shall detail and demonstrate the Bidder's ability to satisfy MC #7. Therefore, certification is sufficient for MC #7. 2d. Question: MC-8 - NSE Strategic Requirements: Would Canada clarify why it does not consider the functional areas of Program Management, Engineering Support, Publication Support and IM/IT as strategic requirements or Key Industrial Capabilities for the engine fleet of Canada's fighter aircraft capability? Would Canada clarify why Program Management, Engineering Support, Publication Support and IM/IT Support do not require at least 90% of labour content to be performed in Canada? Response to item #2d (x-ref Mandatory Criteria # 8): The Department of National Defence has identified that in this specific case, it requires 90% of only the maintenance, repair and overhaul labour to be conducted in Canada for national security reasons. The other elements have not been specified in the NSE. 2e. Question: MC-9 - MRO Capacity: Would Canada clarify why MRO experience is not a mandatory requirement, in light of MC 10, 11, 12 requiring both experience and capacity? Response to item #2e (x-ref Mandatory Criteria # 9): The mandatory requirements in their totality are being used to evaluate the required experience of the Bidder (and/or their sub-contractors). 2f. Question: MC-10 - Would Canada clarify whether the engineering experience to meet this requirement needs to be of similar scale, scope and complexity to the RFP SOW requirements? Response to item #2f (x-ref Mandatory Criteria # 10): To clarify, 12,000 billable engineering hours across the range of activities as identified in the SOWs is the experience, scope and complexity required by DND. 2g. Question: MC-11 - IM/IT: Would Canada clarify whether the IM/IT experience needs to be of similar scale, scope and complexity to the RFP SOW requirements? Response to item #2g (x-ref Mandatory Criteria # 11): No change is required. The IM/IT experience to be demonstrated in MC #11 is as stated in both the description and method of compliance. 3. Lack of Rated Requirements a. It seems unprecedented that there are no Rated Requirements regarding Experience and Risk that the Government considers important, or of value, for in-service support work of this scale and complexity. 3b. Question: Would the Government consider rated requirements for F404-GE-400/-402 experience in each of the SOW functional areas (Program Management, R&O, Engineering, Publication Management, and IM/IT support)? Response to item #3b: No changes are being considered at this time. The selection criteria are lowest cost compliant. 3c.Question: Would the Government consider rated requirements for Implementation and Performance Risk as part of the Technical Evaluation? Response to item #3c: No changes are being considered at this time. The selection criteria are lowest cost compliant. 4. Basis of Payment a. The current method of assigning the bid price neglect the significant impact that labour efficiency plays in determining the overall contract price. For example, Bidder A may submit a labour rate $10 lower than Bidder B, but may take twice as many hours to perform the repair activity as Bidder B, thereby resulting in a significant price disadvantage to Canada. Question: Given that there are many elements of the R&O activity for which the work-scope is fixed, would Canada consider amending the Basis of Payment to more appropriately reflect the expected cost-drivers of the Program. Examples of repairable work for which Canada should expect a firm labour price include: i. Fan Module SAC B; ii. HPC Module SAC B; iii. Combustor Module SAC B; iv. HPT Module SAC B; v. LPT Module SAC B; vi. Front Frame Repair; vii. Exhaust Frame Repair; viii. Fan Rotor; ix. HPC Rotor; x. HPT Rotor and; xi. LPT Rotor Response to item #4.b: Canada has indicated that there will be one rate as it will not penalize or provide an advantage to any one bidders costing methodology and how they account for their employees. It will also ease the administrative burden for Canada and the bidders. For planning purposes, the following are estimated hours per functional area: R&O Shop Floor: 76,000 hrs Engineering / Graphics: 19,000 hrs Program Manager: 2,000 hrs Life Cycle Materiel Manager (LCMM): 6,000 hrs Technical Service Representative (TSR): 8,000 hrs CBMSS Service Representative (CSR) : 4,000 hrs These hours are not guaranteed. 5. Definition of the Bidder as it relates to the Mandatory Requirements a. There appears to be some inconsistency in the Mandatory Requirements and Method of Compliance regarding what experience/capability must be demonstrated by the Bidder and what experience/capability can be demonstrated by subcontractors. For example, MC-1 permits a subcontractor to have existing contracts and MC-3 permits a sub-contractor to have accreditation; however MC-2 requires the Bidder to have the TAA and MC-9 and MC-10 require the Bidder to demonstrate capacity and experience for MRO and Engineering respectively. Question: Can the Government provide greater clarification as to which Mandatory Requirements need to be met by the Bidder and which ones can be met by sub-contractors? Response to item #5: For MC # 1, 3, 10, 11 and 12, DND clarifies that these criteria include both the Bidder himself and/or the entity performing the Work. Original Question from industry Referencing Solicitation W8485-14DL01/B, ANNEX B TECHNICAL STATEMENT OF WORK, Appendix 6 Government Furnished Equipment, Section 2 Table 2: R&O Tooling, please find the enclosed list (notlisted_F404_TOOL_REGISTER.xlsx) of items not listed in the reference Table 2 for review and consideration in the subject RFP section. Rationale for Consideration: In conjunction with the reference Table 2 items, the items listed in the enclosed (or equivalent) are necessary: 1. to carry out our existing F404 R&O Contract with PWGSC and; 2. to carry out the Technical Statement of Work noted in Solicitation W8485-14DL01/B, ANNEX B. Response to item #5: The listing of tooling has been reviewed and will not be added into Appendix 6, Government Furnished and Non-Government Provided Equipment, Section 2, Table 2. Please clarify the contents of Volume V. Section 1. Bid Preparation Instructions. This section identifies Section V as Industrial Regional Benefits, however, further in Section 1, Bid Preparation Instructions, the same section (Section V) is titled Additional Information and requests 1.1 Bidder's Proposed Site or Premises Requiring Safeguarding. Is this additional information regarding safeguarding to be included in Section V: IRB Bid? Response to come Modified RFP documents will be posted shortly. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- Please note that for this requirement the closing date has been amended to March 17, 2014 at 14:00 Eastern Standard Time (EST). ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- -------- Please note that for this requirement the closing date has been amended to March 10, 2014 at 14:00 Eastern Standard Time (EST). ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------Industry is hereby notified that there will be a series of one-on-one engagements to answer questions and provide clarification regarding the subject tender notice. These sessions will be conducted at 455 Boulevard de la Carrière on February 18, 2014 starting at 10am. Please contact Gianni Barreca at Gianni.Barreca@pwgsc-tpsgc.gc.ca to schedule a session and to provide your list of attendees. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- -------- The Department of National Defence has a requirement to acquire services for the Program Support, Maintenance, Engineering, Material, Field Service Representatives, and Publications Support for the F404 Propulsion Group and ancillary components. Procurement Process and Contractor Selection In order to ensure a successful procurement, Canada will consider any suggestions that industry wishes to provide and will allow a consultative process (one on one) along with including responding to written questions and answers which will be shared with all bidders. Requests for One-on-One sessions with DND and PWGSC will be entertained, but are not mandatory, to allow for a better understanding of the requirement and recommendations from industry. All industry questions will be documented and published on "buyandsell.gc.ca". This information will also be subject to the Access to Information Act. Canada shall not reveal any designated proprietary information to third parties. This requirement is for the Department of National Defence. Industrial and Regional Benefits (IRB) will be sought and Bidders are required to commit 100% of the contract value in direct and indirect IRB's. Bidders must be a Canadian registered company. Program and Materiel Support work must be performed in Canada. A National Security Exception is associated with this requirement. Therefore, a minimum of 90% of Repair and Overhaul Labour must be performed in Canada. Contractors who are performing the Maintenance and Engineering work must be AMO accredited by Transport Canada or other international regulatory agencies. Contractors are required to have a Facility Security Clearance of SECRET and personnel who will be working DND facilities shall have a Personal Security Clearance of SECRET. This procurement is subject to Controlled Goods and the Contractors must hold a valid Controlled Goods Certificate. Exceptions: This requirement falls under DND aircraft (FSC 15) and therefore is excluded from, the World Trade Organization - Agreement on Government Procurement under Annex 4, Note 4 and, the North American Free Trade Agreement under Chapter 10, Annex 1001.1b-2, Section B, General Note 1. The National Security Exception under the Agreement on International Trade (AIT), Article 1804, was invoked for this procurement. Provisions of the Comprehensive Land Claims Agreements do not apply to this procurement, as no goods/services are to be delivered/performed in a land claim settlement area. Gianni Barreca Supply Team Leader PWGSC 11 Laurier Street, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0S5 Tel: (819) 956-0181, E-mail Address: Gianni.Barreca@pwgsc-tpsgc.gc.ca Delivery Date: 27/03/2014 The Crown retains the right to negotiate with suppliers on any procurement. Documents may be submitted in either official language of Canada. Delivery Date: Above-mentioned The Crown retains the right to negotiate with suppliers on any procurement. Documents may be submitted in either official language of Canada.
Contract duration
Refer to the description above for full details.
Trade agreements
-
No trade agreements are applicable to this solicitation process
Contact information
Contracting organization
- Organization
-
Public Works and Government Services Canada
- Address
-
11 Laurier St, Phase III, Place du PortageGatineau, Quebec, K1A 0S5Canada
- Contracting authority
- Barreca(bb237), Gianni
- Phone
- (819) 956-0181 ( )
- Fax
- (819) 956-7173
- Address
-
11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier
8C1, Place du PortageGatineau, Québec, K1A 0S5
Buying organization(s)
- Organization
-
Department of National Defence
- Address
-
101 Colonel By DrOttawa, Ontario, K1A0K2Canada
Bidding details
Full details regarding this tender opportunity are available in the documents below. Click on the document name to download the file. Contact the contracting officer if you have any questions regarding these documents.
Document title | Amendment no. | Language | Unique downloads | Date added |
---|---|---|---|---|
ddsf.zip |
French
|
10 | ||
ddsfv2.zip |
French
|
6 | ||
ABES.PROD.PW__BB.B237.F24291.EBSU000.PDF | 000 |
French
|
12 | |
ABES.PROD.PW__BB.B237.F24291.EBSU004.PDF | 004 |
French
|
16 | |
ABES.PROD.PW__BB.B237.E24291.EBSU001.PDF | 001 |
English
|
51 | |
ABES.PROD.PW__BB.B237.E24291.EBSU004.PDF | 004 |
English
|
35 | |
ABES.PROD.PW__BB.B237.E24291.EBSU000.PDF | 000 |
English
|
93 | |
ABES.PROD.PW__BB.B237.E24291.EBSU005.PDF | 005 |
English
|
47 | |
rfpe.zip |
English
|
71 | ||
rfpev2.zip |
English
|
48 |
Access the Getting started page for details on how to bid, and more.